Ipl Scandals

- TheIndian postmortem examination League(IPL) is a professional confederacy forTwenty20cricketchampionship inIndia. It was initiated by the dialog box of Control for cricket in India(BCCI), driftquartered inMumbai,Maharashtra34and is supervised byBCCIVice PresidentRajeev Shukla,5who serves as the federations Chairman andCommissioner. It is currently contested by nine police squads, consi gravel of players from around the cricketing world. -However, the league has been engulfed byseries of corruption scandals. - Contr oversies involving the Indian premier(a) League From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia TheBoard of Control for play in India(BCCI) has found itself in the middle of more conflicts with various cricket calling cards around the world as a consequent of theIndian Premier League(IPL). The main point of contention was that gestural players should always be available to their country for international tours, even if it overlaps with the IPL season.To brood this, the BCCI positively requested that theInternational Cricket Council(ICC) to institute a condemnation period in the International Future Tours Program, solely for the IPL season. This request was not granted at a subsequent meeting held by the ICC. 1 limithide * 1Conflicts with the England and Wales Cricket Board * 2Media re rigorousions * 3Conflict with Cricket Club of India * 4Suspension of Lalit Modi * 5Chirayu Amin named IPL interim chairman * 6Termination of the Kochi franchise * 72012 spot fixing case * 8References - editConflicts with the England and Wales Cricket Board Because the inaugural IPL season coincided with theCounty Championshipseason as well asNew Zealandstour ofEngland, theECBand county cricket clubs raised their concerns to the BCCI over players. The ECB made it abundantly advance that they would not sign No objection Certificates for playersa prerequisite for playing in the IPL. Chairmen of the county clubs in addition made it clear that players contracted to them were required to ulfill their commitment to their county. As a result of this,Dimitri Mascarenhaswas the provided English player to gather in signed with the IPL for the 2008 season. 2 A result of the ECBs concerns around players joining the IPL, was a proposed radical response of creating their own Twenty20 tournament that would be similar in structure to the IPL. The league titled theTwenty20 English Premier League would feature 21 teams in three groups of seven and would materialise towards the end of the summer season. 3The ECB enlisted the aid ofTexasbillionaireAllen Stanfordto launch the proposed league. 4Stanford was the brains behind the successfulStanford 20/20, a tournament that has run twice in theWest Indies. On 17 February 2009, when news of the fraud investigation against Stanford became public, the ECB andWICBwithdrew from talks with Stanford on sponsorship. 56On February 20 the ECB announced it has severed its ties with Stanford and cancelled all contracts with him. 7 - editMedia restrictionsInitially the IPL enforced strict guidelines to media covering matches, consistent with their desire to use the same model sports leagues in North America use in regards to media coverage. Notable guidelines imposed include the restriction to use images taken during the event unless purchased fromcricket. com, owned by stick up Current Media Inc (who won the rights to such images) and the prohibition of live coverage from the cricket grounds. Media agencies also had to agree to upload all images taken at IPL matches to the official website. This was deemed unacceptable by print media around the world.Upon the threat of boycott, the IPL eased up on several of the restrictions. 8On 15 April 2008 a revised portion of guidelines offering major concessions to the print media and agencies was issued by the IPL and accepted by theIndian Newspaper Society. 9 - editConflict with Cricket Club of India As per IPL rules, the winner of the previous contentio n decides the venue for the finals. 10In 2009, the reigning Champions,Deccan Chargerschose theBrabourne StadiuminMumbai. 10However, a difference regarding use of the avilion meant that no IPL matches could be held there. The members of theCricket Club of Indiathat owns the stadium buzz off the sole right to the marquise on match days, whereas the IPL required the pavilion for its sponsors. 11The members were offered free seats in the stands, however the club rejected the offer, stating that members could not be moved out of the pavilion. 101213 - editSuspension of Lalit Modi On 25 April 2010, the BCCI suspendedLalit Modi, the IPL chairman, for aver acts of individual misdemeanours.The suspension notice was served on him by Rajeev Shukla, BCCI vice-president, and N Srinivasan, the board secretary, sending an e-mail to the same effect. It followed a day of negotiations with interlocutors attempting to persuade Modi to publish but pre-empted a potentially flashpoint at a schedule IPL governing council meeting, which Modi had said he would attend. Modi was officially barred from officeicipating in the affairs of the Board, the IPL and any other committee of the BCCI. 14 - editChirayu Amin named IPL interim chairman Chirayu Amin, an industrialist and head of theBaroda Cricket Association, was named interim chairman of the IPL by the BCCI, following Lalit Modis suspension. 15According to BCCI, many a(prenominal) important documents were missing from the IPL and BCCI offices. Many of the records are missing. The IT is asking for documents. We dont have them. We have asked BCCI CAO Prof Ratnakar Shetty to look into the missing records and papers, said BCCI President Shashank Manohar. 16 - editTermination of the Kochi franchise On September 19, 2011, the newly elected BCCI president N Srinivasan, after the course of instructionbook general meeting in Mumbai, announced that the Kochi Tuskers Kerala IPL franchise was terminated by the BCCI for breaching its term s of agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, each franchise has to submit a bank guarantee every year that covers the fee payable to the BCCI. The 2010-founded team was bought for Rs 1,550 crore and the consortium has to pay a bank guarantee of156 crore every year till 2020. 17The consortium that owns Kochi is reported to have defaulted on an annual requital of156 crores as a bank guarantee. In April 2010, the BCCIs working committee had rejected demands from Kochi and Pune Warriors for a reduction in their franchisee fees. The two new franchises, which made their debuts in 2011, had sought a 25% waiver on the grounds that the BCCI had give tongue to in the bidding document that each team would play 18 league matches in a season. The schedule was later reduced to 14 matches per team. - edit2012 spot fixing case Main article2012 Indian Premier League spot fixing case On 14 whitethorn 2012, an Indian news channelIndia TVaired asting operationwhich accused 5 players involved ins pot fixing. Reacting to the news, Indian Premier League presidentRajiv Shuklaimmediately suspended the 5 uncapped players. The five players were,TP Sudhindra(Deccan Chargers),Mohnish Mishra(Pune Warriors), Amit Yadav,Shalabh Srivastava(Kings XI Punjab) andAbhinav Bali, Delhi cricketer . 18However, the report went on to claim that none of the illustrious cricketers were found guilty.On the reliability of the report,Rajat Sharma, theeditor-in-chiefof news channelIndia TVquoted that the channel had no doubts about the authenticity of the sting operation and prepared to go to court. 19 Mohnish Mishra who was part ofPune Warriors Indiateam for the season, admitted to have said that franchises pay black gold, in a sting operation. Mishra was caught on tape saying that franchisees paid them black money and that he had received1. 5crore(US$273,000)from the later, among which1. 2crore(US$218,400)was black money. 20He was also suspended from his team. 21